Story from the Field: Critical Conversations About Housing Justice

This post was written by Mar Kidvai Padilla, an MSSW Candidate at the University of Texas at Austin.

People experiencing homelessness are daily faced with meeting immediate survival needs and coping with the impacts of trauma and illness, both physical and mental, that can escalate into a state of crisis. The social workers providing services to clients experiencing homelessness at Integral Care, where I am completing my first-year internship as an MSSW student at the University of Texas at Austin, show deep empathy and a clear sense that our clients face unnecessary barriers and injustices as they seek permanent housing.

As social workers, we often use a macro perspective to analyze the connections between individual hardships faced by clients and the implementation of local policy, such as Austin’s No Sit No Lie Ordinance that criminalizes resting or sleeping on sidewalks, benches, and in parks. Some of us correlate our specific work and policy advocacy to a larger abstract project of ending homelessness. However, very few of us can articulate our personal vision of housing justice, even as we may understand ourselves to be working shoulder to shoulder with other professionals trying to achieve it.

As an educator and organizer, I know that a shared vision of social justice cannot be taken for granted. Without vision, no accountability between client and social worker can exist, no tactics or strategy can be formulated, and no evaluation of our efforts is possible. As scholar and activist Gloria E. Anzaldúa asserts, “Nothing happens in the ‘real’ world unless it first happens in the images in our heads.”

Thus, we must engage in critical conversations and ask each other:

  • What does a world in which all people are housed look and feel like?
  • What is the global history of housing justice and what markers of our success can we use to assess our progress here and now in late capitalism?
  • What does it say about our society that some people, often disabled individuals and survivors of trauma, are denied housing?
  • How can we eliminate (rather than bandage) the power dynamics that produce housing crises for Black and brown clients at the intersection of multiple oppressions?

To this end, I am planning a workshop for my Macro Field Project to be delivered at Integral Care’s annual Dynamic Development Day (DDD). The session, titled Housing as a Human Right: Exploring Our Visions of Justice, will offer service providers space and time to discuss our ideals, collectively analyze the history of housing rights, and compare housing data and social movements transnationally. Proposing and having the workshop accepted for DDD was exciting, but I recognize, of course, that no vision of housing justice is possible without the centering of people experiencing homelessness. Our theory of change must integrate the understandings and visions of the people most directly affected, so I decided to pilot some of my workshop in the women’s support group I co-facilitate at the Trinity Center, which provides services to people experiencing homelessness.

Introducing the 1970s feminist consciousness-raising groups as a model, I asked clients:

  • Why do people become homeless?
  • What does homelessness say about our society?
  • What are the differences between “homeless people”, “people experiencing homelessness”, and “people denied housing”?

After a robust conversation, I led an art activity in which clients first painted what it would “look, sound, and feel like if everyone has been housed” and then what it would “look, sound, and feel like to work with other people without homes toward this goal”.

I noticed that initially many clients rejected the idea that they were themselves homeless (despite all sleeping on the streets or in shelters) and often blamed homelessness on irresponsibility, moral failures, and drug misuse. When I raised the issue that many people use substances because of unaddressed trauma or mental illness, and that disability keeps many people unemployed, the discussion shifted dramatically. Suddenly, the women began to claim the need for supportive housing for individuals and families, including drug treatment options, not just legal punishment. The group ended with members energized and voicing that they were considering issues from new perspectives, particularly impactful because of the collective nature of these sentiments.

Facilitating this group was illuminating and will help me prepare for my macro project and other future work. First, I will be able to assure DDD participants that these conversations are possible if we check our paternalism when voicing fears that these topics “hit too close to home” for our clients, while also cautioning us from assuming all homeless people’s experiences and feelings are the same. Second, it will help me suggest methods to push beyond stigma, promote cooperation between clients, and open channels for clients to teach providers. Beyond DDD, I would urge all social workers interested in housing justice to initiate these conversations and build shared understandings with each other, but especially with our clients. In this way, we will mutually set the course for our movements.

board-Mar-Kidvai-Padilla (1)About the Author: Pictured left, Mar Kidvai Padilla (pronouns: they/them) is an MSSW Candidate at the University of Texas at Austin. They obtained their MS Ed in 2012 at Hunter College in New York City. They have spent the past 15 years working for freedom in a variety of roles, including as a community organizer, domestic violence hotline operator, human trafficking researcher, elementary school teacher, HIV/HCV tester, harm reduction counselor, and sexual health training manager. They believe housing justice is only possible in a decolonized world that centers Black liberation.


Homeless Services and the “i” Word

This post was guest-authored by Elizabeth Bowen, Assistant Professor of Social Work at the University at Buffalo, State University of New York.

When we talk about the field of services for people experiencing or at risk of homelessness—where the field has been, where it is, where it’s going—one word I’m increasingly hearing is innovation.

But, what does this word really mean?

Is it just a buzzword, or does it indicate a meaningful shift in thinking and design for the homelessness services sector?

The actual definition of innovation is fairly straightforward. Per an article in the Stanford Social Innovation Review, an innovation is a process or outcome that’s both novel and an improvement on the status quo. I will admit that there’s a part of me, though, that instantly interprets the word innovation as someone telling me, “What you and your peers and collaborators have been doing is not good enough.

Many people and organizations do excellent work in homelessness services, day in and day out (and overnight, as homeless services are definitely not a 9-to-5 thing). Providers work with homeless and housing insecure families to make sure children’s education is not disrupted, they do their best to keep shelters clean and safe, they go out in all kinds of crazy weather to do outreach, build relationships, and connect people with services. And these are just a few examples. All in all, I think most homeless service providers do a fine job with very limited resources, and sometimes their work is downright heroic. So, I get a little defensive when I hear the i-word heaved in their direction.

These were some of the questions and reservations on my mind when I had the opportunity to co-teach a class last summer for Social Impact Fellows, a collaboration between the University at Buffalo School of Social Work, School of Management, and Blackstone LaunchPad. In its inaugural year in 2017, eight MSW and eight MBA students worked in cross-disciplinary pairs to complete an innovation project at a local socially-minded business or nonprofit. Kelly Patterson, from the School of Social Work, Tom Ulbrich, from the School of Management, and I co-taught the classroom portion of the fellowship, which included many discussions around the meaning of terms like social enterprise, social entrepreneurship, social impact…and, of course, the i-word.

The experience of co-teaching the class led me to a deeper reflection on innovation and what it means for homeless services. My fear is that when people think about innovation and homelessness, they will think that they have the answer, or even that there is a single answer to ending homelessness, just waiting to be discovered by the next innovator bright and creative enough to see it. As a researcher, it is apparent to me that homelessness is a complex social problem. It has no single cause, and I do not think it has a single solution. It will not be conclusively solved in a hackathon or in an afternoon’s design thinking lab.

In teaching the Social Impact Fellowship class, though, I realized there were ways I could talk and teach about innovation and homelessness without oversimplifying either. One of the topics we covered in class was systems change, the idea that any innovation should be considered within the context of larger systems and ultimately that creating social impact means working with an eye toward comprehensive systems change, rather than focusing only on particular programs or institutions. There were numerous examples from homeless services that I could draw from to illustrate systems change, such as coordinated entry—the redesigning of homelessness services for an entire city or geographic area around a centralized, person-centered intake and assessment process. I also pointed to Housing First as an example of a system-wide and research-driven paradigm shift in homeless services, as insightfully described in Deborah Padgett, Benjamin Henwood, and Sam Tsemberis’ book Housing First: Ending Homelessness, Transforming Systems, and Changing Lives. This book and the Housing First story it tells contain another key lesson about innovation: The best, and arguably the only truly viable, solutions emerge from listening to and raising up the voices of the people directly affected by the social problems we seek to address.

As it happened, three of the 2017 Social Impact Fellowship student teams’ projects were related to housing and homelessness. One team assisted social service agency and supportive housing provider Lt. Col. Matt Urban Human Services Center in developing a screen-printing business as a social enterprise to generate revenue while helping clients build employment skills. Another team worked with bicycle and active transportation advocates Go Bike Buffalo to pilot a program to provide bikes, helmets, and basic cycling training for homeless and low-income people to use as transportation to work and appointments. And, a third group researched and created policies and structures for a new housing program at Belmont Housing Resources for Western New York for young people aging out of foster care.

None of these projects solved homelessness, of course. But they did augment and shift current services and program models in exciting, needed, and—dare I say—innovative ways. When the class concluded, I was left feeling proud of what the homeless services sector has already accomplished, hopeful about the system-level changes currently underway, and optimistic about the potential for future advances.

The Grand Challenge to End Homelessness continues. Innovators welcome.

Elizabeth_Bowen_Small (1)Blog Post Author: Elizabeth Bowen, PhD, is an Assistant Professor in the School of Social Work at the University at Buffalo, State University of New York. Her research focuses on the relationship between housing and health. She is also the university’s faculty liaison for the National Center’s National Homelessness Social Work Initiative. In this role, she co-facilitates the New York-New Jersey Regional Network. Read her previous blog post here.

College at Brockport Students Use Class Project to Reduce Stigma towards People Experiencing Homelessness

Nicole Garcia and Sydney Hull, undergraduate students in social work at the College at Brockport, had an interest in the issue of homelessness in Rochester, NY. As part of a course on social work methods, they developed a simulation project called Racing for Housing to reduce college students’ stigma towards and stereotypes about the homeless population. In this post, Nicole and Sydney write about their Racing for Housing pilot project and its effect on students.

While doing an internship at a local homeless service agency, we saw firsthand the significant number of barriers that prevent homeless individuals from obtaining permanent housing. Negative perceptions about homeless people and the causes of homelessness factor into these barriers.

At our own college, we encounter individuals who stereotype the homeless population. These negative perceptions of homeless individuals aren’t unique to our college. In a 2014 survey of undergraduate students’ perceptions of poverty and homelessness, 57% of participants reported believing that homelessness is due to individual laziness, and 60% said it was likely due to not working hard enough to earn income.

The findings of this survey motivated us to do something to help educate students on campus. Our solution was to create a poverty simulation called Racing for Housing, which we developed and piloted for the project requirement for our Social Work Methods III course. The primary goal of Racing for Housing is to diminish stereotypes of individuals who are homeless through education, engagement, and advocacy.

Racing for Housing is designed to give students firsthand experience of the everyday challenges an individual searching for housing faces. We brought this simulation into two junior social work classes. The entire activity comprised the Racing for Housing simulation, two guest speakers, and a pre- and post-survey to evaluate the effectiveness of the activity. Forty-five students participated.

Before the activity, we administered a pre-survey to gauge students’ understanding of the contributing factors to being homeless and their general perceptions of the homeless population. After completing the survey, each student received a notecard with a scenario that reflected a common barrier that individuals experiencing homelessness encounter. Example barriers included mental illness, a substance abuse disorder, and a criminal record.

Each scenario had directions regarding which room the student needed to travel to in the building. In this activity, there were four rooms with two types of agencies in each room. The agencies included were as follows: the Department of Human Services, the Rochester Psychiatric Center, the House of Mercy Homeless Shelter, a realtor, the Center for Youth, Vital Records, a hospital, and the Unemployment Office. When students arrived to their assigned agency, there was a volunteer who gave them instructions.

Each participant had to make three stops in an attempt to access housing, and they were only given 10 minutes to complete the task. Below is an example of a scenario.

Example Scenario: Experiencing a Shelter Sanction Barrier

Role: You are a 30-year-old African American woman fleeing domestic violence. You are also a single mother with two children and are in search of a two-bedroom apartment.

Process: The student (or “mother”) is instructed to go to the shelter stop where the volunteer (or “shelter worker”) tells the student that they were sanctioned and have to go to the Department of Human Services (DHS) to find out why. When the student goes to DHS, they find out that they are under a 30-day sanction for not handing in paperwork in time. They are then told to go to the House of Mercy shelter, because they do not enforce the sanction in their shelter. This is the student’s (or “mother’s”) last stop.

The 10 minutes allowed for each scenario represent what a newly homeless individual might go through in 24 hours. Some students never reached the third stop, and when some students did, they were surprised by the type of housing they received. While they may have found shelter for the night, they did not find permanent or stable housing. This realization reflected the harsh realities that homeless individuals endure each day.

Following the simulation, students listened to two guest speakers – a formerly homeless woman who shared her journey and the barriers she faced and the co-founder of a non-profit who spoke of their program’s utilization of the housing first model and its successes.

A post-survey was administered at the end, which included an open-ended question that asked participants about their learning experience. Dr. Carmen Aponte, assistant professor, helped interpret the survey data. The survey results showed that participants came into the activity well-informed about the causes of homelessness. However, after engaging in the simulation and hearing from the guest speakers, there was a change in the participants’ perceptions and prejudices. Sample comments from the open-ended question are below:

“It can be easy to forget the soul underneath the homeless or difficulties a person faces. [I] will work hard to not pre-judge those facing homelessness.”

“Some disabilities are invisible, and we should never assume.”

“[The] activity and guest speakers changed my perception on the stereotype of all homeless individuals and that they aren’t all in that predicament because of limited education or low income.”

“I never knew just how many barriers there were in order to get into quality housing.”

“It changed my perception on those that are mentally, physically disabled. I especially didn’t think [about] the disabilities you can’t see and are unnoticeable.”

The object of the activity was to receive housing. But in reality, none of the students received housing. Instead, they received some form of shelter, if they made it to their third stop. It is crucial that the students not think that a shelter, psychiatric center, or other institutional setting is a form of permanent housing. When students enter the field of social work, we don’t want them to be satisfied with placing a client in a shelter. If students work with the homeless population, we want them to strive to get their clients in an apartment or other form of housing that they can call home.

Blog Post Authors:

picture nicole garcia
Nicole Garcia

Nicole Garcia received her Bachelor’s degree in Social Work from the College at Brockport in 2017 and will earn her MSW from the University at Buffalo this May. She is currently completing her graduate internship at Genesee Mental Health Center, working with individuals experiencing mental health and substance use disorders, and she also works as a Complex Care Manager at MC Collaborative.

Sydney Hull



Sydney Hull earned her BSW degree in Social Work in May 2018. After her year-long internship at Person Centered Housing Options, she is now looking for employment with youth and/or persons with developmental/intellectual disabilities.




University of Alaska Collaborates with City Library to Serve Homeless Patrons

Anchorage, Alaska is a midsize community similar to other urban areas in many ways and is home to the state’s largest public library, Z.J. Loussac Library. The library is a safe, warm, and welcoming place, but also is often a place that reflects community needs. Like other urban libraries, Loussac was seeing an increase in patrons who needed assistance that often fell outside the scope of what public libraries are traditionally equipped to provide. Sarah Preskitt, who came to the Library in 2013 as the Adult Services Librarian at Loussac, immediately recognized that many of the patrons utilizing the library needed more help than librarians and staff could give. At the same time, other members of the community were beginning to declare their resentment at having to share public space with people who were homeless or displaying challenging behaviors.

Indeed, the needs noted by Preskitt are real and compelling. A recent in-person survey of 739 library patrons conducted by the Anchorage Public Library found that 27% of respondents reported experiencing challenges, such as mental illness, alcoholism, dementia, developmental disabilities, and/or traumatic brain injury. Further, 24.8% of the patrons completing the in-person survey, and an additional 81 patrons who responded to an online version, were currently experiencing homelessness.

Not to be stopped, Preskitt began searching for real solutions. In 2015, she met Dr. Pam Bowers, a then University of Alaska social work faculty member, and the two developed a collaboration between the library and students enrolled in a social work practice with organizations and communities course. From that collaboration, the idea of developing a practicum site at the library developed. In August 2016, Preskitt began supervising Rebecca Barker, the first MSW social work intern at the library, which marked the beginning of a wonderful partnership to end homelessness among library patrons.

From her experience, Barker strongly believes that information sharing via a respectful therapeutic relationship can be a positive facilitator for empowerment and encouraging patrons to connect with needed services. Along with regularly assisting patrons, Barker developed a community resource guide for the librarians and staff, attended city homeless coalition meetings, and was trained as a coordinated entry site for the city.

“That positive relationship you build with an individual allows you to create confidence in that person to reach out to access needed services, which is scary, and overwhelming. But when they have the support and experience of a positive human interface, you create confidence in the person to take the challenge and reach out to access services.”
~ Rebecca Barker

Lib Photo 2 (1)This year, MSW students Katelyn Sonido and Tamara Boeckman (pictured right) are interning in two city libraries where they work with librarians to address a variety of unmet informational and social service needs for patrons, many of whom are experiencing homelessness. Each Sunday, Boeckman and Sonido staff a resource table (pictured below) in the welcoming entrance of the Loussac Library. 

Lib Photo 1 (1)In addition to working with patrons and assisting with referrals, Sonido developed a very popular weekly job lab that assists patrons with job searching, applications, and interview skills at the Mountain View Library. Boekman also provides advocacy work and assists library leadership with developing procedures for patrons who have violated library rules to assure due process. In addition, the two have presented to librarians and staff about trauma-informed homeless services and barriers to care.

“The library has become an integral place in the community to reach homeless individuals that other Continuum of Care agencies haven’t reached.”
~ Tamara Boeckman, MSW

City librarians and staff appreciate the students and feel they provide increased access and empowerment through information and resources within the library. This partnership has been so successful that the library is currently seeking funding for a full time social worker.

“The MSW students are better at asking hard questions and their training prepares them to understand what people need and where to start uniquely with each patron. They can help patrons prioritize their needs in a really skillful way.”
~ Sarah Preskitt

Blog Post Authors: Kathi Trawver, PhD (Associate Professor, University of Alaska Anchorage), Sarah Preskitt (Adult Services Librarian at Z.J. Loussac Library), Rebecca Barker, Katelyn Sonido, and Tamara Boeckman (all MSW students)

Catholic University Students Explore Youth Homelessness in D.C.

According to the 2016 Annual Homeless Assessment Report to Congress, 9% of the U.S. homeless population (or ~50,000 individuals) is between the ages of 18 and 24. Most of these young people, nearly 32,000, were counted as ‘unaccompanied youth.’ This term encompasses young adults living on the streets or in unstable housing without the presence of a family. A recent homeless count in Washington, D.C. identified 211 unaccompanied youth between the ages of 18 and 24.

To understand the experiences of young adults experiencing homelessness in Washington, D.C., Pathways to Housing teamed up with the Catholic University of America’s National Catholic School of Social Service (NCSSS) to conduct a qualitative research study. Under the guidance of Dr. Linda Plitt Donaldson, graduate social work students within the NCSSS hit the streets to interview these young adults as part of a fall semester class on homelessness in the U.S.  Semi-structured interviews were conducted to understand the precipitating factors and current experiences of the youths’ homelessness, as well as to learn about the specific services that might support young adults in getting into stable housing.

Pathways outreach workers trained students in identifying and approaching young adults in locations around the city.  The team interviewed 57 young adults between the ages of 18 and 30, with a mean age of 22.  Of these 57 young adults, 27 reported that this was their first time experiencing homelessness.  Most reported that they stay and sleep on the streets overnight while others sleep at shelters, in the homes of family and friends, or in abandoned houses.  At the time of the interviews, the young adults reported having been homeless between four days and 15 years, with an average length of time in homelessness of approximately three years.

During the interviews, the young adults detailed situations that precipitated their current experiences of homelessness.  Many of these accounts included significant trauma and victimization, such as ongoing physical or sexual abuse. Others found themselves on the streets due to poor re-entry planning as they transitioned from foster care or jail.  Still, others reported having left their last housing situation of their own will – feeling as though they were a burden to family or due to overcrowding in the home.  Overwhelmingly, most reported that their most recent experience of homelessness resulted from being “kicked out” of their home by a family member.  For some of the youth, this resulted from “not getting along with” another member of the household.  For others, this followed rape or other forms of abuse perpetuated by a family member or a family member’s significant other.

CUABlogPostPic1The young adults shared the range of coping strategies they use to survive on the streets of D.C.  Many reported relying on friends and family for resources, such as occasional meals, showers, or a place to stay.  Others were honest about activities they engage in to “just to get by”, such as stealing or selling drugs.  However, amid their challenges and uncertain circumstances, many spoke of their strides to set goals for themselves and a drive to maintain hope for the future.

When asked about the single most important thing that would help them overcome homelessness, the young adults overwhelmingly advocated for the availability of more affordable housing.  This aligns with a recent statement made by Michael Ferrell, the executive director of the Coalition for the Homeless, in an article by the New York Times detailing challenges associated with housing D.C.’s homeless population.  Ferrell stated that the difficulty is not the increase of homeless individuals as much as it is a lack of affordable housing in D.C.

In advocating for the self-professed needs of D.C.’s unaccompanied youth experiencing homelessness, the NCSSS team offers the following recommendations:

  • increase the availability of affordable housing and supports to access housing;
  • increase opportunities for employment and education;
  • increase the availability of trauma-informed mental health and social supports;
  • increase service assistance to obtain vital documentation, such as birth certificates and identification cards;
  • increase the number of drop-in centers; and
  • increase implementation of Critical Time Intervention (CTI) to prevent homelessness for young adults exiting foster care, incarceration, or other institutions.

A final recommendation includes increasing efforts to support families to prevent youth homelessness.  Forty out of 57 (70%) of the young adults participating in this study talked specifically about challenging family environments that precipitated their most recent experience of homelessness. Respondents were often kicked out of their homes or left on their own due to crowded or toxic family environments. For other respondents, homelessness resulted after the death of a family member, causing the loss of their home. Still others aged out of foster care. Families need help to address root
causes of homelessness, such as the lack of
affordable housing, the lack of living wage
jobs with benefits, relationship conflict, and substance abuse.  Programs are needed to foster community engagement and support for these families within the neighborhoods in which they live.

When the young adults were asked what the city could do to assist in getting people off the streets, they requested that service providers step up their game in helping to navigate the housing process and be willing to “take a chance” on them. The participants offered their own words of advice with regard to ending homelessness among young adults in Washington, D.C.:

“Don’t give up…sometimes I give up on myself.”

“Focus on hands up, not hands out. Help people develop skills.”

“Take a chance on people. I just want someone to take a chance on me. Not everybody is trying to get one over on the system.”

11952697_855986404905_5378313742419667396_oBlog Post Author: Bonnie L. McIntyre, PhD student within the Catholic University of America National Catholic School of Social Services (pictured right) 

The National Center Supports Youth Homelessness Symposium

Note: This post was guest authored by Jenna Mellor, Associate Director of Point Source Youth.

Point Source Youth is thrilled that the National Center for Excellence in Homeless Services (the National Center) is a presenting sponsor of the upcoming Second Annual Symposium on Solutions to End Youth Homelessness. This nationwide convening of leaders addressing youth homelessness—from providers to youth, policy experts to researchers—is co-sponsored by New York University’s Silver School of Social Work (a partner of the National Center) and the McSilver Institute of Poverty, Policy, and Research, and will be held at New York University’s Kimmel Center on April 30th and May 1st, 2018.

The participation of the National Center is especially critical because social workers are at the forefront of supporting individuals experiencing homelessness. Social workers are well-positioned to demand the systems change needed to re-imagine the cycle of displacement for youth experiencing homelessness – a cycle perpetuated by traditional shelter models. Excellence includes embodying what we know are best practices in the field: Housing First, positive youth development, trauma-informed care, anti-racism and equity practices, and ensuring that youth are meaningful collaborators in the solutions that impact them most.

Leaders in social work practice, research, and education were instrumental to the success of last year’s symposium and in planning exciting, new content for this year. We are excited to have presenters from three of the National Center’s partner schools – NYU, the University of Southern California (USC), and Hunter College. Drs. Deborah Padgett (NYU) and Ben Henwood (USC), national co-leaders of the Academy for Social Work and Social Welfare’s Grand Challenge to End Homelessness, will both be presenting. Dr. Padgett is on our  planning committee and will lead an interactive breakout session on innovative research. Dr. Henwood (USC) will present on his work at the intersections of health, technology, and youth homelessness. Dr. Jama Shelton (Hunter College) also serves on the planning committee, and is partnering with planning committee member and youth advocate Sophie-Rose Cadle to plan a breakout session on centering the leadership and self-defined priorities of trans and gender expansive youth experiencing homelessness. Continuing Education Credits will be provided by NYU.

Other presenters include Drs. Eric Rice and Robin Petering (both of USC) and Dr. Matthew Morton (Chapin Hall). Dr. Morton will present on the monumental data released by the Voices of Youth Count project, which shows the scope of youth homelessness nationally and the disproportionate experiences of youth of color, queer youth, and parenting youth. The findings were recently released in their Missed Opportunities report and have motivated many of us to do more and do better. For more information about Missed Opportunities and its implications for social work, check out the National Center’s recent blog post on the topic.

Dr. Padgett eloquently describes the need for the symposium and why social workers seeking excellence should consider attending:

“Youth homelessness in the United States has reached record levels, yet not enough is known about ‘what works.’ DebP With a robust evidence base and human rights values,Housing First has shown that relying on institutional care and shelters diverts scarce funding and support away from effective long-term solutions. To advance the national discourse on helping homeless youth in the Housing First era, this symposium features promising approaches, including rapid re-housing, host homes, and family strengthening.  Attendees will not only learn about best practices and policies but will be asked to join in solving the problem of youth homelessness through effective and passionate advocacy.”

Planning committee member and youth advocate Marcelle LaBrecque, pictured below, (who is, not coincidentally, the dynamic co-host of Point Source Youth’s webinar series Ask A Rockstar!) seconds the value of attending the symposium: “You will leave changed, regardless of if you come for the information, the food, or the people,” he said. Learning about the interventions and hearing the advocacy of a wide range of young people and adult allies will change you and your approach to ending youth homelessness.” 


We look forward to seeing new and familiar faces at this year’s symposium. And, for those of you interested in learning more about the National Center, Amanda Aykanian, the National Center’s Research and Project Lead, will be attending both days.

Blog Post Author: Jenna Mellor (pictured left), Associate Director at Point Source Youth, is a harm reduction advocate with nine years of experience at the intersection of direct service and program development. Her work is rooted in the principles of bodily autonomy and human dignity, and she is passionate about Point Source Youth’s goal of building the evidence base for Housing First practices in youth housing.

UAlbany Supports Statewide Coalition for Homeless Youth

In November, the University at Albany’s School of Social Welfare co-hosted the New York Coalition for Homeless Youth’s (CHY) Annual Conference for the fourth year in a row. CHY is a statewide membership network of providers who serve runaway and homeless youth and young adults across New York. This partnership aligns with UAlbany’s goals for the National Homelessness Social Work Initiative and its role as part of the New York-New Jersey Regional Network.

Amanda Aykanian, doctoral candidate and Research and Project Lead for the National Center, works closely with CHY’s executive director, Jamie Powlovich, to plan the event. Cara Duffy, the school’s administrative assistant, supports this effort by managing space, food, and parking logistics.


This year’s conference took place over two days, with the first day at UAlbany and the second at the First Unitarian Universalist Society of Albany. Along with the many CHY member attendees, there were several young people in attendance – most who are members of New York City’s homeless youth advisory council (pictured left, with Jamie Powlovich on the far right). Young people had active roles throughout the event. You can hear the powerful opening remarks from Ja’asriel Bishop here.

The conference theme was, “Resilience and Resistance: Empowering Youth and Improving the Systems that Serve Them”. Workshops and roundtables addressed a wide range of topics, including the following:

  • federal policy updates and strategic recommendations
  • meeting the legal needs of homeless youth
  • Housing First best practices
  • human trafficking
  • outreach strategies
  • working with transgender and non-binary youth
  • using administrative data to measure housing trajectories
  • rural services resources and challenges
  • statewide policy planning


Amanda presented findings from a study she recently conducted in the Capital Region on service and policy considerations when working with homeless youth. This study was  published in Children and Youth Services Review. She also led a roundtable on using youth leadership to end youth homelessness (pictured right).

The event closed with the presentations of the 2017 Margot Hirsch Moxie Award (pictured below), which was given to Michael Berg, executive director of Family of Woodstock.

55ae6fa5-d59e-4d6e-8f27-ad448575914bFor more information on CHY, check out their website and Facebook page.

For more information on youth homelessness, read our recent post about the Voices of Youth Count project.

Blog Post Author: Amanda Aykanian, MA, Research and Project Lead, National Center for Excellence in Homeless Services